Sunday, February 11, 2007

Stock spammers have a burst of honesty

This morning, I was absentmindedly looking through my daily dose of spam, and noticed that the message headers were divided into three groups. First, there are the four-word random phrases:

Be seraphim my ferromagnetic
Is sadist as estoppal
But methacrylate be shenanigan

("Be seraphim my ferromagnetic" sounds like something you could put on a Valentine's Day greeting card.) Next up are the three-word random phrases:

in go promptitude
He or bygone
To to sherry
In be Renoir
do to molest
so do shave

All of these spam messages, and the four-word ones, are for the same penny stock. According to one message, its current value is $0.17, and "We're talking it all the way to $0.95". Isn't that giving the game away a bit?

Last up, there's the messages with long and vaguely geek-like subject headers:

is that it may help Linux being recognized as something to be taken seriously:
The Finnish parliament has approved plans to curtail TV and cinema advertising by beverage alcohol producers.
The sendmail chapter has been written and contributed by Vince Skahan.
With the Internet much of a buzzword recently, and otherwise serious people joyriding along the

These messages all include the following, which is either random text or an extremely honest disclaimer:

Information herein may contain forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B of the SEC Act of 1934. Statements that involve discussions with respect to future events. Don't rely on them. This company doesn't report. Past performance not indicative of future. We received 300,000 free trading shares and $1,000 from a non-affiliate. We have sold 186,000 shares and purchased 16,000 shares in the market at .12. We intend to sell all 130,000 shares we have left now, which could cause the stock to go down. This company has: no revenue in its most recent quarter, nominal cash,an accumulated deficit and a reliance on loans from related parties. It is not a revenue producing company. These factors raise doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. This is high risk stock. This report shall not be taken as investment advice or solicitation. Read the company's information statement now.

Are these people law-abiding inside-trading stock speculators? Are they wondering whether people are willing to speculate wildly even when told, up front, what is going to happen? Is this some bizarre sociological experiment? What's going on here?